Skip to main content

Jungle Book Advertising And Representation



First ever Jungle Book was a story by Rudyard Kipling in 1894.

He moved out of India when he was around 7. 

1913- British Empire held sway over 412 million people (23% of the worlds population at the time)

1920- it covered 35,500,000km (24% of the earths total land area) 

Mowgli, the wolf pack, Bhalu and Bagheera (represented the British Empire)

Shere Khan, Bandar-log monkeys (represent colonised India)


Allegory-
Mowgli- human, clever
Wolf pack- democratic, noble, follow the law of the jungle, organised
Bhalu- wise
Bagheera- wise, military leader
Shere khan- wild, killer, rebellious, law breaker
Bandar-log monkeys- uncivilised, wild, lacks discipline, simple 


How the Jungle Book cartoon can be seen as offensive
All the animals speak in posh english accents except for the orangutang which is spoken by a black character and in jive not a posh accent. Jive is associated with black people and so are orangutangs. King Louis sings the song 'I want to be like you' can be seen as racist because he is trying to be a white person which is what most black people in America in 1967 felt like. 


Task 4 
In the 1967 version the director has taken the stereotypical country and landscapes to base the film on but the 2016 version Favreaus is not basing it on any stereotypical country but instead taking elements from every country and designing his own jungle. In the 2016 version the accent in the song 'I want to be like you' by king louis is the same as the other characters. The 1967 version has made the accent of King Louis as a jive accent and being played by a black person, this could be seen as racist because a 'black' actor is wanting to be a white characters. By eliminating the only white actors and one black actor it has gotten rid of the underlying racism in the 2016 version. In the 1967 version the actors are mainly white british actors where as the 2016 version has actors of different ethnicity also eliminating racism. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Print Media- The Big Issue

The Big Issue is a street newspaper and is a right wing newspaper.  Objectives are ‘Vendor-centric’  – our charity work is led by the hopes and aspirations of Big Issue vendors ‘Inclusive’  – social and financial inclusion at the heart of our philosophy ‘Non-judgmental’  – we work with anyone who is prepared to engage with self-help. somewhere meaningful to call home access to a doctor and equality of access to health care opportunities the essential support that is needed to overcome addictions direct help with business skills to maximize independent earnings the crucial personal identification that opens so many doors access to additional financial support and secure saving opportunities the opportunity to re-connect with family members and loved one The Big Issue Foundation is a financially independent charity. We believe in a ‘hand up and not a hand out’ and recognise that earning an income is a key step in a person’s journey towards s...

Media Language in the Jungle Book

­­Media Language in the Jungle Book In the 2016 trailer of the Jungle Book has been created using computers and CGI as well as special effects making it look verisimilitude . The animals and background images have been made to look incredibly realistic, this then attracts attention to how the movie looks so real when really it’s a movie containing talking animals. In comparison the 1967 version of the Jungle Book has been made as a cartoon with no special computers or technology, the backgrounds are watercolour and the animals are simple animations. This doesn’t make the movie realistic and is more attractive to the younger audience. Dramatic non-diegetic music has been used throughout the trailer to give the audience a small hint that the movie is going to be really dramatic and have lots of twists and turns. Then there is the diegetic sound of Scarlet Johansson talking as the snake, which is calm and juxtaposes the dramatic movie but then towards the end of the movie you act...

Downton Abbey analysis

At 0:47 the contrast in costumes shows the difference between the rich and the poor. The rich people are wearing expensive, traditionally high class outfits (suits) and the lower class are wearing work outfits for example the servants (aprons and hats) and the paper boy. This shows a direct contrast between the two classes.  There is high key lighting in the upper class peoples section of the house showing that they are more powerful because they are in a brightly lit area. Low key lighting is used in the areas of the house such as the kitchen where the servants work and live because traditionally they would be in the bottom floor of the house.  At 0:49, the man looks down on the paper boy as he is late and snatches the paper from him.  At 1:09 there is a close up shot of the man reading the newspaper and you can see the facial expression but there is no clue on what he is reading.  At 1:17 you can see the class difference as the lower class workers have to i...